DIGITAL CULTURE AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTS: A CRITICISM OF ART. 95 OF LAW No. 14,133/2021
This article brings together elements for a critical analysis of art. 95 of Law No. 14,133/2021 (which determines the drawing up of an administrative contract instrument), in comparison with the current scenario of digital culture and the adoption of digital documents by the Public Administration. C...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Language: | Português |
| Published: |
TJDFT
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/1058 |
| _version_ | 1872056516145577984 |
|---|---|
| author | Jasper Cunha da Silva, Rafael Knaesel Arrabal, Alejandro |
| author_browse | Jasper Cunha da Silva, Rafael Knaesel Arrabal, Alejandro |
| author_facet | Jasper Cunha da Silva, Rafael Knaesel Arrabal, Alejandro |
| author_sort | Jasper Cunha da Silva, Rafael |
| collection | Revista de Doutrina Jurídica |
| description | This article brings together elements for a critical analysis of art. 95 of Law No. 14,133/2021 (which determines the drawing up of an administrative contract instrument), in comparison with the current scenario of digital culture and the adoption of digital documents by the Public Administration. Carried out using the hypothetical-deductive method, the research hypothesizes that the legal requirement to formalize an administrative contract instrument is out of step with the emerging digital culture in society and, from a legal perspective, is an obsolete measure to regulate relationships contractual agreements between the State and individuals. As a result, the article presents elements that confirm the proposed hypothesis. Although legally required, the drawing up of a specific contractual instrument appears to be obsolete, as the conditions that define and guide the contract appear in the bidding notice (or in the act that authorizes direct contracting) together with the winning proposal, information that, in digital media, can be managed, without the need for consolidated reproduction. |
| first_indexed | 2026-05-27T18:49:26Z |
| format | Online |
| id | ojs-rdj-article-1058 |
| institution | TJDFT |
| issn | 2675-9640 |
| language | Português |
| last_indexed | 2026-05-27T18:49:26Z |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | TJDFT |
| publisherStr | TJDFT |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | ojs-rdj-article-10582025-10-28T23:02:34Z DIGITAL CULTURE AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTS: A CRITICISM OF ART. 95 OF LAW No. 14,133/2021 Formalização do contrato administrativo na era digital: superação da lavratura de instrumento Jasper Cunha da Silva, Rafael Knaesel Arrabal, Alejandro Cultura digital. Documentos digitais. Contrato administrativo. Instrumento do contrato. Administração pública. This article brings together elements for a critical analysis of art. 95 of Law No. 14,133/2021 (which determines the drawing up of an administrative contract instrument), in comparison with the current scenario of digital culture and the adoption of digital documents by the Public Administration. Carried out using the hypothetical-deductive method, the research hypothesizes that the legal requirement to formalize an administrative contract instrument is out of step with the emerging digital culture in society and, from a legal perspective, is an obsolete measure to regulate relationships contractual agreements between the State and individuals. As a result, the article presents elements that confirm the proposed hypothesis. Although legally required, the drawing up of a specific contractual instrument appears to be obsolete, as the conditions that define and guide the contract appear in the bidding notice (or in the act that authorizes direct contracting) together with the winning proposal, information that, in digital media, can be managed, without the need for consolidated reproduction. Objetivo: este artigo propõe a observação crítica do art. 95 da Lei 14.133/2021, o qual determina a lavratura de instrumento do contrato administrativo, em cotejo com o atual cenário da cultura digital e da adoção de documentos digitais pela administração pública. Método: realizada a partir do método hipotéticodedutivo, a pesquisa considera como hipótese que a exigência legal de formalização de instrumento do contrato administrativo está em descompasso com o estado da técnica no campo das Tecnologias Digitais de Informação e Documentação – TDICs – e, sob o aspecto jurídico, é um expediente cuja forma instrumental, herdeira no paradigma cartular, não agrega benefícios para a disciplina das relações contratuais entre o Estado e os particulares. Resultado: como resultado, o artigo apresenta elementos que confirmam a hipótese proposta. Embora legalmente exigida, a lavratura de um instrumento contratual específico mostra-se obsoleta, na medida em que as condições que definem e orientam o contrato constam do edital da licitação (ou do ato que autoriza a contratação direta), em conjunto com a proposta vencedora. Essas informações, digitalmente dispostas, proporcionam condições de tratamento e gestão que dispensam registros repetitivos orientados à consolidação e/ou síntese. TJDFT 2025-09-26 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto application/pdf https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/1058 10.64544/rdj.v116i00.1058 Revista de Doutrina Jurídica; Vol. 116 (2025): Publicação contínua; e025003 Revista de Doutrina Jurídica; v. 116 (2025): Publicação contínua; e025003 2675-9640 2675-9624 10.22477/rdj.v116i00 por https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/1058/220 Brasil; Século XXI Copyright (c) 2025 Rafael Jasper Cunha da Silva, Alejandro Knaesel Arrabal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| spellingShingle | Jasper Cunha da Silva, Rafael Knaesel Arrabal, Alejandro DIGITAL CULTURE AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTS: A CRITICISM OF ART. 95 OF LAW No. 14,133/2021 Cultura digital Documentos digitais Contrato administrativo Instrumento do contrato Administração pública |
| title | DIGITAL CULTURE AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTS: A CRITICISM OF ART. 95 OF LAW No. 14,133/2021 |
| title_full | DIGITAL CULTURE AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTS: A CRITICISM OF ART. 95 OF LAW No. 14,133/2021 |
| title_fullStr | DIGITAL CULTURE AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTS: A CRITICISM OF ART. 95 OF LAW No. 14,133/2021 |
| title_full_unstemmed | DIGITAL CULTURE AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTS: A CRITICISM OF ART. 95 OF LAW No. 14,133/2021 |
| title_short | DIGITAL CULTURE AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTS: A CRITICISM OF ART. 95 OF LAW No. 14,133/2021 |
| title_sort | digital culture and administrative contracts: a criticism of art. 95 of law no. 14,133/2021 |
| topic | Cultura digital Documentos digitais Contrato administrativo Instrumento do contrato Administração pública |
| topic_facet | Cultura digital Documentos digitais Contrato administrativo Instrumento do contrato Administração pública |
| type_str | Artigo |
| url | https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/1058 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jaspercunhadasilvarafael digitalcultureandadministrativecontractsacriticismofart95oflawno141332021 AT knaeselarrabalalejandro digitalcultureandadministrativecontractsacriticismofart95oflawno141332021 AT jaspercunhadasilvarafael formalizacaodocontratoadministrativonaeradigitalsuperacaodalavraturadeinstrumento AT knaeselarrabalalejandro formalizacaodocontratoadministrativonaeradigitalsuperacaodalavraturadeinstrumento |