The underuse of repetitive claims resolution incident: : analysis of the fundamentals of inadmission of incidents in the TJDFT
The article aims to address the underutilization of the repetitive claims resolution incident in the Brazilian Judiciary, even after 7 years since the creation of the institute. The research focused on the reasons for not admitting the incidents. An empirical jurisprudential analysis, quantitative a...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Language: | Português |
| Published: |
TJDFT
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/896 |
| _version_ | 1872056526669086720 |
|---|---|
| author | do Monte Silva, Lucas Seráphico da Nóbrega Coutinho, Francisco |
| author_browse | Seráphico da Nóbrega Coutinho, Francisco do Monte Silva, Lucas |
| author_facet | do Monte Silva, Lucas Seráphico da Nóbrega Coutinho, Francisco |
| author_sort | do Monte Silva, Lucas |
| collection | Revista de Doutrina Jurídica |
| description | The article aims to address the underutilization of the repetitive claims resolution incident in the Brazilian Judiciary, even after 7 years since the creation of the institute. The research focused on the reasons for not admitting the incidents. An empirical jurisprudential analysis, quantitative and qualitative, of the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories (TJDFT) was made, carrying out a cross-sectional analytical study of the demands related to the theme, in order to present an "argumentative radiography" of the judgments of the said Court. In the end, it was possible to observe the difficulty of fulfilling the legal requirements (art. 976 of the Code of Civil Procedure), especially considering that most repetitive cases within the scope of the Judiciary Power require factual analysis, even without the need for probative instruction, which makes it impossible to admit the IRDR. In addition, it concluded that the parties are still trying to use the IRDR as an appeal substitute, after failing to succeed in the appeal, seeking, a posteriori, standardization with the understanding of another Civil Chamber. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.22477/rdj.v114i00.896 |
| first_indexed | 2026-05-27T18:49:43Z |
| format | Online |
| id | ojs-rdj-article-896 |
| institution | TJDFT |
| issn | 2675-9640 |
| language | Português |
| last_indexed | 2026-05-27T18:49:43Z |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | TJDFT |
| publisherStr | TJDFT |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | ojs-rdj-article-8962023-09-06T19:20:53Z The underuse of repetitive claims resolution incident: : analysis of the fundamentals of inadmission of incidents in the TJDFT Subutilização do incidente de resolução de demandas repetitivas: análise das inadmissões dos incidentes no tjdft do Monte Silva, Lucas Seráphico da Nóbrega Coutinho, Francisco Irdr. Precedentes. Juízo de admissibilidade. Processo civil. The article aims to address the underutilization of the repetitive claims resolution incident in the Brazilian Judiciary, even after 7 years since the creation of the institute. The research focused on the reasons for not admitting the incidents. An empirical jurisprudential analysis, quantitative and qualitative, of the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories (TJDFT) was made, carrying out a cross-sectional analytical study of the demands related to the theme, in order to present an "argumentative radiography" of the judgments of the said Court. In the end, it was possible to observe the difficulty of fulfilling the legal requirements (art. 976 of the Code of Civil Procedure), especially considering that most repetitive cases within the scope of the Judiciary Power require factual analysis, even without the need for probative instruction, which makes it impossible to admit the IRDR. In addition, it concluded that the parties are still trying to use the IRDR as an appeal substitute, after failing to succeed in the appeal, seeking, a posteriori, standardization with the understanding of another Civil Chamber. O artigo aborda a subutilização do Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas – IRDR no Poder Judiciário brasileiro, mesmo após sete anos desde a criação do instituto. Objetivo: a pesquisa objetiva focar os motivos de inadmissão dos incidentes instaurados. Método: houve a realização de análise empírica jurisprudencial, quantitativa e qualitativa do Tribunal de Justiça do Distrito Federal e dos Territórios – TJDFT, com estudo analítico transversal das demandas relacionadas com o tema, de forma a apresentar uma “radiografia argumentativa” dos acórdãos da referida Corte. Ao final, observou-se a dificuldade de preenchimento dos requisitos legais (art. 976 do Código de Processo Civil), sobretudo considerando que a maioria dos casos repetitivos no âmbito do Poder Judiciário necessita de análise fática, mesmo com a prescindibilidade de instrução probatória, o que impossibilita a admissão do IRDR. Resultado: além disso, concluiu-se que as partes ainda utilizam o IRDR como sucedâneo recursal, após não obter êxito em suas respectivas inconformações, buscando, posteriormente, uniformização com entendimento de outra câmara cível. TJDFT 2023-09-06 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto application/pdf https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/896 10.22477/rdj.v114i00.896 Revista de Doutrina Jurídica; Vol. 114 (2023): Publicação contínua; e023009 Revista de Doutrina Jurídica; v. 114 (2023): Publicação contínua; e023009 2675-9640 2675-9624 10.22477/rdj.v114i00 por https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/896/197 Brasil; Século XXI Copyright (c) 2023 Lucas do Monte Silva, Francisco Seráphico da Nóbrega Coutinho https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| spellingShingle | do Monte Silva, Lucas Seráphico da Nóbrega Coutinho, Francisco The underuse of repetitive claims resolution incident: : analysis of the fundamentals of inadmission of incidents in the TJDFT Irdr Precedentes Juízo de admissibilidade Processo civil |
| title | The underuse of repetitive claims resolution incident: : analysis of the fundamentals of inadmission of incidents in the TJDFT |
| title_full | The underuse of repetitive claims resolution incident: : analysis of the fundamentals of inadmission of incidents in the TJDFT |
| title_fullStr | The underuse of repetitive claims resolution incident: : analysis of the fundamentals of inadmission of incidents in the TJDFT |
| title_full_unstemmed | The underuse of repetitive claims resolution incident: : analysis of the fundamentals of inadmission of incidents in the TJDFT |
| title_short | The underuse of repetitive claims resolution incident: : analysis of the fundamentals of inadmission of incidents in the TJDFT |
| title_sort | underuse of repetitive claims resolution incident: : analysis of the fundamentals of inadmission of incidents in the tjdft |
| topic | Irdr Precedentes Juízo de admissibilidade Processo civil |
| topic_facet | Irdr Precedentes Juízo de admissibilidade Processo civil |
| type_str | Artigo |
| url | https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/896 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT domontesilvalucas theunderuseofrepetitiveclaimsresolutionincidentanalysisofthefundamentalsofinadmissionofincidentsinthetjdft AT seraphicodanobregacoutinhofrancisco theunderuseofrepetitiveclaimsresolutionincidentanalysisofthefundamentalsofinadmissionofincidentsinthetjdft AT domontesilvalucas subutilizacaodoincidentederesolucaodedemandasrepetitivasanalisedasinadmissoesdosincidentesnotjdft AT seraphicodanobregacoutinhofrancisco subutilizacaodoincidentederesolucaodedemandasrepetitivasanalisedasinadmissoesdosincidentesnotjdft AT domontesilvalucas underuseofrepetitiveclaimsresolutionincidentanalysisofthefundamentalsofinadmissionofincidentsinthetjdft AT seraphicodanobregacoutinhofrancisco underuseofrepetitiveclaimsresolutionincidentanalysisofthefundamentalsofinadmissionofincidentsinthetjdft |