The Pretrial detention in domestic violence against women
The Federal Statute n. 11.340/2006 is the result of an international movement to protect women who are victims of domestic and family violence. The statute recognizes the vulnerability of victims and seeks to protect them effectively. To this end, it diversifies the possibilities of orders and measu...
| Principais autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online |
| Idioma: | Português |
| Publicado em: |
TJDFT
2025
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: | https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/1042 |
| _version_ | 1872056515474489344 |
|---|---|
| author | Dantas Aguiar Melo, Luísa Graciano Suxberger, Antonio Henrique |
| author_browse | Dantas Aguiar Melo, Luísa Graciano Suxberger, Antonio Henrique |
| author_facet | Dantas Aguiar Melo, Luísa Graciano Suxberger, Antonio Henrique |
| author_sort | Dantas Aguiar Melo, Luísa |
| collection | Revista de Doutrina Jurídica |
| description | The Federal Statute n. 11.340/2006 is the result of an international movement to protect women who are victims of domestic and family violence. The statute recognizes the vulnerability of victims and seeks to protect them effectively. To this end, it diversifies the possibilities of orders and measures towards the aggressors. The Maria da Penha Statute establishes a protective jurisdiction with peculiarities compared to the ordinary jurisdiction, including the possibility of the judge acting ex officio to order precautionary measures in general. The Criminal Procedure Code, altered by the Federal Statute n. 13.964/2019, disabled the judge from ordering pre-trial detention without a request from the Public Prosecutor's Office. This situation generated an apparent antinomy between the statutes. This paper discusses, regarding the cases of domestic and family violence against women, whether there is a succession of statutes in time or the prevalence of specialty in the protective regime established by the Maria da Penha Statute. The research is of the legal-comprehensive type and uses a deductive approach. It carries out a literature review and documentary analysis, the latter of modified legal statements and court cases indicating the understanding of the issue by the District Federal’s Court and the Superior Justice Court (STJ). In the end, it concludes that there is a special nature to cases of domestic and family violence against women, which authorizes the exceptional hypothesis of procedural detention ordered by the judge even without prior provocation by the party. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.22477/rdj.v115i00.1042 |
| first_indexed | 2026-05-27T18:49:25Z |
| format | Online |
| id | ojs-rdj-article-1042 |
| institution | TJDFT |
| issn | 2675-9640 |
| language | Português |
| last_indexed | 2026-05-27T18:49:25Z |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | TJDFT |
| publisherStr | TJDFT |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | ojs-rdj-article-10422025-01-24T20:11:10Z The Pretrial detention in domestic violence against women A prisão preventiva de ofício nos casos de violência doméstica e familiar contra a mulher Dantas Aguiar Melo, Luísa Graciano Suxberger, Antonio Henrique Prisão processual. Poder geral de cautela. Violência doméstica e familiar contra a mulher. Pacote anticrime. The Federal Statute n. 11.340/2006 is the result of an international movement to protect women who are victims of domestic and family violence. The statute recognizes the vulnerability of victims and seeks to protect them effectively. To this end, it diversifies the possibilities of orders and measures towards the aggressors. The Maria da Penha Statute establishes a protective jurisdiction with peculiarities compared to the ordinary jurisdiction, including the possibility of the judge acting ex officio to order precautionary measures in general. The Criminal Procedure Code, altered by the Federal Statute n. 13.964/2019, disabled the judge from ordering pre-trial detention without a request from the Public Prosecutor's Office. This situation generated an apparent antinomy between the statutes. This paper discusses, regarding the cases of domestic and family violence against women, whether there is a succession of statutes in time or the prevalence of specialty in the protective regime established by the Maria da Penha Statute. The research is of the legal-comprehensive type and uses a deductive approach. It carries out a literature review and documentary analysis, the latter of modified legal statements and court cases indicating the understanding of the issue by the District Federal’s Court and the Superior Justice Court (STJ). In the end, it concludes that there is a special nature to cases of domestic and family violence against women, which authorizes the exceptional hypothesis of procedural detention ordered by the judge even without prior provocation by the party. A Lei nº 11.340/2006 é fruto de uma movimentação internacional para a proteção das mulheres vítimas de violência doméstica e familiar. A lei reconhece a vulnerabilidade das vítimas e busca protegê-las de maneira eficaz. Para tanto, diversifica as possibilidades de respostas aos agressores. A Lei Maria da Penha estabelece uma jurisdição protetiva com peculiaridades em face da jurisdição comum, dentre elas, a possibilidade de atuação ex officio do magistrado na decretação das medidas cautelares em geral. A alteração promovida no código de Processo Penal pela Lei nº 13.964/2019 vedou a decretação da prisão preventiva pelo juiz sem que haja pedido do Ministério Público. Esse quadro gerou aparente antinomia entre os diplomas normativos. O artigo discute, nos casos de violência doméstica e familiar contra a mulher, se há sucessão de leis no tempo ou prevalência da especialidade no regime protetivo estabelecido na Lei Maria da Penha. A pesquisa é do tipo jurídico-compreensiva e se vale de abordagem dedutiva. Promove revisão da literatura e análise documental, esta última dos enunciados legais modificados e dos julgados indicativos da compreensão do tema pela justiça do Distrito Federal e pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Ao fim, conclui pela especialidade presente nos casos de violência doméstica e familiar contra a mulher, para autorizar a excepcional hipótese de prisão processual decretada pelo juiz mesmo sem provocação prévia da parte. TJDFT 2025-01-24 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto application/pdf https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/1042 10.22477/rdj.v115i00.1042 Revista de Doutrina Jurídica; Vol. 115 (2024): Publicação contínua; e024012 Revista de Doutrina Jurídica; v. 115 (2024): Publicação contínua; e024012 2675-9640 2675-9624 10.22477/rdj.v115i00 por https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/1042/217 Brasil; Século XXI Copyright (c) 2025 Luísa Dantas, Antonio Suxberger https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| spellingShingle | Dantas Aguiar Melo, Luísa Graciano Suxberger, Antonio Henrique The Pretrial detention in domestic violence against women Prisão processual Poder geral de cautela Violência doméstica e familiar contra a mulher Pacote anticrime |
| title | The Pretrial detention in domestic violence against women |
| title_full | The Pretrial detention in domestic violence against women |
| title_fullStr | The Pretrial detention in domestic violence against women |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Pretrial detention in domestic violence against women |
| title_short | The Pretrial detention in domestic violence against women |
| title_sort | pretrial detention in domestic violence against women |
| topic | Prisão processual Poder geral de cautela Violência doméstica e familiar contra a mulher Pacote anticrime |
| topic_facet | Prisão processual Poder geral de cautela Violência doméstica e familiar contra a mulher Pacote anticrime |
| type_str | Artigo |
| url | https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/1042 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dantasaguiarmeloluisa thepretrialdetentionindomesticviolenceagainstwomen AT gracianosuxbergerantoniohenrique thepretrialdetentionindomesticviolenceagainstwomen AT dantasaguiarmeloluisa aprisaopreventivadeoficionoscasosdeviolenciadomesticaefamiliarcontraamulher AT gracianosuxbergerantoniohenrique aprisaopreventivadeoficionoscasosdeviolenciadomesticaefamiliarcontraamulher AT dantasaguiarmeloluisa pretrialdetentionindomesticviolenceagainstwomen AT gracianosuxbergerantoniohenrique pretrialdetentionindomesticviolenceagainstwomen |