THE DISTINGUISHING: THE PROPPER JURISDICIONAL PROVISION AS A RIGHT UNDER FEDERAL CONSTITUTION`S SIGHT
The interest of the research, focused on Legal Hermeneutics and also on the adequate jurisdictional provision, aims to trace elements of the judicial precedent, as a whole, and of distinguishing, as a specific object, in the system of mandatory precedents, adopted by the Brazilian Civil Procedure Co...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online |
| Idioma: | Português |
| Publicado em: |
TJDFT
2022
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: | https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/794 |
| _version_ | 1872056523698470912 |
|---|---|
| author | Dantas Júnior, João Fabrício |
| author_browse | Dantas Júnior, João Fabrício |
| author_facet | Dantas Júnior, João Fabrício |
| author_sort | Dantas Júnior, João Fabrício |
| collection | Revista de Doutrina Jurídica |
| description | The interest of the research, focused on Legal Hermeneutics and also on the adequate jurisdictional provision, aims to trace elements of the judicial precedent, as a whole, and of distinguishing, as a specific object, in the system of mandatory precedents, adopted by the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code. Therefore, the argument of distinction imposes the search for elements of its legal nature, its limits and also how such a system of precedents reinforced the importance of the interpretative and argumentative activity of the one who intends to exclude the application of a precedent. Using a deductive method of argumentation, the research seeks to achieve how the distinguishing argument, in the face of a precedent, would be a cooperation tool for procedural speed, legal certainty, jurisdictional cohesion and, also, cooperation, democratization of interpretation and also the defense of due process of law. The changes brought by the technique of precedent, through the construction of a binding system of reasoning, also brought high importance to the legal arguments for distinguishing. This judgment technique with linked reasoning, moreover, encouraged research on procedural principles and how they would continue to be respected in the procedural cooperation model currently adopted. The distinguishing, though, earns a constitutional guarantee covering, as this faces a due process` violation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.22477/rdj.v113i00.794 |
| first_indexed | 2026-05-27T18:49:38Z |
| format | Online |
| id | ojs-rdj-article-794 |
| institution | TJDFT |
| issn | 2675-9640 |
| language | Português |
| last_indexed | 2026-05-27T18:49:38Z |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | TJDFT |
| publisherStr | TJDFT |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | ojs-rdj-article-7942022-10-29T00:40:05Z THE DISTINGUISHING: THE PROPPER JURISDICIONAL PROVISION AS A RIGHT UNDER FEDERAL CONSTITUTION`S SIGHT O distinguishing: a adequada prestação jurisdicional como um direito à luz da constituição federal Dantas Júnior, João Fabrício Devido processo. Distinguishing. Fundamentação. Precedente. The interest of the research, focused on Legal Hermeneutics and also on the adequate jurisdictional provision, aims to trace elements of the judicial precedent, as a whole, and of distinguishing, as a specific object, in the system of mandatory precedents, adopted by the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code. Therefore, the argument of distinction imposes the search for elements of its legal nature, its limits and also how such a system of precedents reinforced the importance of the interpretative and argumentative activity of the one who intends to exclude the application of a precedent. Using a deductive method of argumentation, the research seeks to achieve how the distinguishing argument, in the face of a precedent, would be a cooperation tool for procedural speed, legal certainty, jurisdictional cohesion and, also, cooperation, democratization of interpretation and also the defense of due process of law. The changes brought by the technique of precedent, through the construction of a binding system of reasoning, also brought high importance to the legal arguments for distinguishing. This judgment technique with linked reasoning, moreover, encouraged research on procedural principles and how they would continue to be respected in the procedural cooperation model currently adopted. The distinguishing, though, earns a constitutional guarantee covering, as this faces a due process` violation. Objetivo: focada na Hermenêutica Jurídica e na adequada prestação jurisdicional, a pesquisa objetiva traçar elementos do precedente judicial, como um todo, e do distinguishing, como objeto específico, sob o sistema de precedentes obrigatórios adotado pelo Código de Processo Civil brasileiro. O argumento de distinção impõe a busca de elementos de sua natureza jurídica, de seus limites e, ainda, de como o sistema de precedentes reforçou a importância da atividade interpretativa e argumentativa em casos em que se pretende afastar a aplicação de um precedente. Método: metodologicamente, utilizou-se de fontes normativas, doutrinárias e jurisprudenciais para alcançar como o argumento dodistinguishing, diante de um precedente, apresenta-se como ferramenta de cooperação para a celeridade procedimental, a segurança jurídica, a coesão jurisdicional e, ainda, de defesa do próprio devido processo legal. Resultado: como resultados, a pesquisa visa alcançar como o sistema de precedentes e ainda o argumento do distinguishing velaram pela isonomia constitucional e, portanto, também pela dignidade. Tanto a técnica de julgamento com fundamentação vinculada como, ainda, o distinguishing, enquanto método de controle e interpretação do sistema, encorajaram a pesquisa sobre princípios processuais e sobre como esses continuam respeitados no modelo de cooperação processual atualmente adotado. O distinguishng, assim, ganha roupagem de garantia constitucional, diante de uma violação aodevido processo. TJDFT 2022-10-28 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto application/pdf https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/794 10.22477/rdj.v113i00.794 Revista de Doutrina Jurídica; Vol. 113 (2022): Publicação Contínua; e022010 Revista de Doutrina Jurídica; v. 113 (2022): Publicação Contínua; e022010 2675-9640 2675-9624 10.22477/rdj.v113i00 por https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/794/179 Brasil; Século XXI Copyright (c) 2022 João Fabrício Dantas Júnior https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| spellingShingle | Dantas Júnior, João Fabrício THE DISTINGUISHING: THE PROPPER JURISDICIONAL PROVISION AS A RIGHT UNDER FEDERAL CONSTITUTION`S SIGHT Devido processo Distinguishing Fundamentação Precedente |
| title | THE DISTINGUISHING: THE PROPPER JURISDICIONAL PROVISION AS A RIGHT UNDER FEDERAL CONSTITUTION`S SIGHT |
| title_full | THE DISTINGUISHING: THE PROPPER JURISDICIONAL PROVISION AS A RIGHT UNDER FEDERAL CONSTITUTION`S SIGHT |
| title_fullStr | THE DISTINGUISHING: THE PROPPER JURISDICIONAL PROVISION AS A RIGHT UNDER FEDERAL CONSTITUTION`S SIGHT |
| title_full_unstemmed | THE DISTINGUISHING: THE PROPPER JURISDICIONAL PROVISION AS A RIGHT UNDER FEDERAL CONSTITUTION`S SIGHT |
| title_short | THE DISTINGUISHING: THE PROPPER JURISDICIONAL PROVISION AS A RIGHT UNDER FEDERAL CONSTITUTION`S SIGHT |
| title_sort | distinguishing: the propper jurisdicional provision as a right under federal constitution`s sight |
| topic | Devido processo Distinguishing Fundamentação Precedente |
| topic_facet | Devido processo Distinguishing Fundamentação Precedente |
| type_str | Artigo |
| url | https://revistajuridica.tjdft.jus.br/rdj/article/view/794 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dantasjuniorjoaofabricio thedistinguishingthepropperjurisdicionalprovisionasarightunderfederalconstitutionssight AT dantasjuniorjoaofabricio odistinguishingaadequadaprestacaojurisdicionalcomoumdireitoaluzdaconstituicaofederal AT dantasjuniorjoaofabricio distinguishingthepropperjurisdicionalprovisionasarightunderfederalconstitutionssight |